University of Edinburgh logo

Proceedings of the Clarinet and Woodwind Colloquium 2007

CELEBRATING THE COLLECTION OF SIR NICHOLAS SHACKLETON

Meeting organised by the Edinburgh University Collection of Historic Musical Instruments

Reid Concert Hall, Edinburgh, 22-24 June 2007

Web URL: www.euchmi.ed.ac.uk/uec07tpa.html

See Full details of the Colloquium publication

Abstracts of Papers

Stubbins S-K Mechanism Clarinet

Nophachai Cholthitchanta
Fulbright College of Arts & Sciences, University of Arkansas, USA

The clarinette à anneaux mobiles, known as the "Boehm System" clarinet, was invented as a collaboration between the clarinetist Hyacinthe Klosé and maker Louis-Auguste Buffet, and was first introduced at the Paris Exhibition in 1839. Since then there have been several attempts to "perfect" the Klosé/Buffet clarinet.

The majority of these attempts have concentrated on the upper joint; one attempt was to improve the "fuzziness" of the throat Bb. The defect of the throat Bb note has been a problem for the clarinet ever since the beginning of its development. It was known that the problem was due to the dual function for the speaker key to produce both the overblown twelfth and throat Bb. However, not until the beginning of the twentieth century did makers finally attempt to solve this problem by creating two separate tone-holes, one for for each purpose, and by designing two separate keys to cover them.

The Stubbins S-K System was invented by William H. Stubbins, an acoustician and a former professor of clarinet at the University of Michigan, Ann Arbor. Stubbins ingeniously and successfully adapted ideas from earlier approaches to solving the throat Bb "fuzziness" problem for the Boehm System clarinet. He patented his "S-K Mechanism" invention in 1950.

This paper addresses the approach in the Stubbins S-K System.

Clarinets and Tárogatók used in the Viennese Court Opera under the Director Gustav Mahler

Beatrix Darmstädter
Sammlung alter Musikinstrumente, Kunsthistorisches Museum, Vienna

The basis of this paper is the interpretation of archival documents belonging to the inventory of the files named "Generalintendanz" and "Hofoper" preserved by the Austrian State Archives (Österreichisches Staatsarchiv) and evaluated for the first time. The material includes for instance correspondence of Gustav Mahler, who became the artistic director of the Viennese Court Opera in 1897, with renowned instrument makers, such as Wilhelm Heckel, Georg Berthold, József Schunda and with the musicians Felix Weingartner, Heinrich Hiekisch, Franz Schalk etc. The archival documents provide information about technological details, pricing, delivery conditions, instrument repairs and the musician's individual preferences concerning the choice of instruments. Moreover the authorities interacting within the administrative board of the Court Opera deciding the acquisitions of musical instruments become clear. As far as the tárogató is concerned it was Gustav Mahler himself who invited Mr. Hiekisch, a musician working for the Opera in Budapest, to introduce a new designed tárogató in Vienna. Although his appearance in Tristan and Isolde in 1902 was quite successful, further engagements seemed to be impracticable mainly because the instrument needed was a special construction with an additional lower key which was neither delivered nor received in Vienna, furthermore the Viennese clarinettists - as the documents tell us - never got used to the difficult intonation of the tárogatók.

The Home Key of the Clarinet

John Dick
Rothesay, Isle of Bute, U.K.

"Home Key" refers to a concept well understood by baroque and early classical wind players, makers, bandmasters and composers. Written sources advise on the selection of a size of clarinet and the principles followed by composers can be inferred from opera scores, Scottish Military band parts, and transcriptions. Tonal quality has often been over-emphasised as the reason for the selection of a particular size of instrument and digital facility or precision of tuning has been wrongly assumed to be the aim of early additions to keywork. When the reasons why instruments have a home key are understood, these factors are seen to be secondary. The Home Key provides the explanation for many apparent anomalies and raises the issue of whether it is unhelpful to think of the instruments as having "good" and "bad" notes or "improvements" in design. These changes are developments in response to changed operational requirements. Focus on the home key can lead to challenging the current attribution of an instrumental part. This is illustrated by two very well known pieces. One is, and the other is not, currently considered clarinet repertoire.

The Early American Clarinet: Makers, Sellers, Players

Jane Ellsworth
Eastern Washington University, USA

The clarinet's role and status in early American musical life has received little scholarly attention until now. Yet clarinets were being made in America by 1761 and imported by 1764. Military documents, newspaper advertisements, tutors, and existing instruments provide ample evidence for the kinds of clarinets that were in use. Makers such as Wolhaupter, Anthony, Callender, Catlin, Whiteley, Meacham, Eisenbrandt, Gütter, Ashton, and many others were active in all of the major cities, as were merchants who sold clarinets from England and elsewhere. This paper examines the activities of these makers and sellers, identifies several heretofore unknown makers, and considers some of the ways in which the clarinet was used in America in the late eighteenth and early nineteenth centuries.

The Sir Nicholas Shackleton Collection in the Edinburgh University Collection of Historic Musical Instruments: an Overview

Heike Fricke
Berlin

The late Sir Nicholas Shackleton collected about 800 clarinets over some 40 years and his collection has been bequeathed to the Edinburgh University Collection of Historic Musical Instruments. This paper gives an overview of the clarinets chosen for an exhibition dran from the collection. Starting with early examples of eighteenth century instruments, made, for example, by Rottenburgh of Brussels, Cahusac of London, and Buehner & Keller of Strasbourg, the author takes a closer look at English clarinets of the early nineteenth century, comparing them with continental instruments of the same period. Lyon with the instrument makers Bernard, Simiot, Piatet et Benoit, and Jeantet seems to have been a place of outstanding instrument making as some examples show. Other important centres of clarinet making in the 19th century were Paris, Brussels, Munich, Vienna, and Dresden. Regional differences and developments are shown with selected clarinets made by Baumann, Buffet jeune, Adolphe Sax, Jacques Albert, Bachmann, Stiegler, Hess, Osterried & Gerlach, Griesbacher, Ziegler, Uhlmann, and Grenser. Finally the instruments of Fritz Wurlitzer are examined (Nicholas Shackleton much admired them).

The Origin of French and German Clarinets

Eric Hoeprich
Royal Conservatory of the Netherlands; Conservatoire de Paris; Indiana University, Bloomington

Today, the schism between French and German clarinettists is profound, and occasionally even engenders animosity. It certainly defines potential employment in various countries; currently, no player of the French clarinet can sit in the Berlin Philharmonic Orchestra, nor will any German clarinettist ever be welcome in Paris, or for that matter, London or New York City.

Already by 1800, specific, national characteristics in clarinet design had emerged, establishing nascent characteristics of French and German instruments. In fact, by the 1820s, clarinets in each country possessed qualities that were entirely unique, and playing styles adapted accordingly. In Paris, Frédéric Berr, for example, mentioned specific local makers in his Traité (1836), as did several others, such as Fröhlich in Würzburg, Backofen in Darmstadt and Fahrbach in Vienna.

The origins of this division and its influence on musical life is a fascinating subject with an unlimited number of international repercussions, a variety of which are discussed.

The Basset Horn in France in the Eighteenth Century

Jean Jeltsch
Université de Lille, France

We often read that Paris was a very important centre in the developemnt of larger clarinet family instruments, for example the appearance of the bass clarinet (Gilles Lot) or the first use of low clarinets (Missa pro defunctis of Gossec). But no example is known today of any bass or "alto" clarinet bearing the stamp of a Parisian workshop and made in the 18th century. Only two basset horns made in Paris are known today (Michel Amelingue and Dominique Porthaux), and a third made in Strasbourg (Bühner & Keller).

The basset horn was not played in France as it was in neighbouring countries, particularly in South Germany and Austria, and this paper examines the reasons for this. Detailed study of the construction of these three surviving curved french basset horns (all different from each other) allows us to assess their musical function, and also reveals some relationships with other curved basset horns. The entire corpus of these sickle-shaped basset horns was thoroughly examined by Sir Nicholas Shackleton in 1987*: this study completes the French part of this remarkable work, taking into account the discovery of the important Amelingue basset horn in 2002.

* Nicholas Shackleton, `The Earliest Basset Horns', Galpin Society Journal, 1987, pp.2-23.

Clarinets of the Clinton Family

James Joseph
Northumberland

This paper seeks to provide a re-appraisal of the work done by Arthur Clinton and his two sons George and James in the field of clarinet design. Having lived for 35 years in Newcastle upon Tyne which was the Clintons' native city, the author had a unique opportunity to access local sources of information. Other valuable sources include patents, instruments in major collections and practical performance experience by the author on his own Clinton instruments.

Patents were from Arthur (the father) in 1884 and 1891, and James in 1891 and 1898. George offered no patent applications. However, as a pre-eminent clarinettist and professor in major London conservatoires he also acted as a clarinet consultant with Boosey and Co. In this role, helped by the eminent acoustician David Blaikley, he developed the models of clarinet which bear his name - the Clinton System and the Clinton-Boehm. The former of these models enjoyed considerable popularity into the mid-twentieth century.

James Clinton, also a fine player tended to concentrate more on instrument design, especially a Combination Clarinet with models in the Albert and Boehm Systems. For this he enlisted the services of J.B. Albert of Brussels and formed a company for its manufacture and distribution chaired by Sir Arthur Sullivan.

Personal circumstances are described where germane to the investigation and where they differ from the published literature. Finally the influences on design, mutual and otherwise, are explored.

Musical History: Historical Music

Colin Lawson
Royal College of Music, London

"I am convinced that 'historical' performance today is not really historical; that a thin veneer of historicism clothes a performance style that is completely of our own time, and is in fact the most modern style around; and that the historical hardware has won its wide acceptance and above all its commercial viability precisely by virtue of its novelty, not its antiquity". Richard Taruskin's once notorious yet now widely-accepted views can justifiably be applied to those most tangible of artefacts - the instruments themselves. As long ago as 1932 Arnold Dolmetsch's pupil Robert Donington remarked of his teacher's reconstructions; "the old harpsichord has certain limitations [and produces] a jangle, slight in the treble but audible in the bass. The new instruments, which remedy these historical oversights, have proved both purer and more sustained than any previous harpsichord". Two generations later Robert Barclay drew attention to the finger-holes often placed on copies of the Baroque trumpet, so that "the so-called out-of-tune harmonics of the natural series will not be unpleasant to modern sensitivity. The result is a trumpet which resembles its baroque counterpart only superficially." During the heady days of recording activity in the early 1990s Clive Brown issued a timely warning that the characteristics of some of the orchestral instruments employed in Beethoven cycles by The Hanover Band, Christopher Hogwood and Roger Norrington would certainly not have been familiar to musicians in Beethoven's Vienna and that the public was in danger of being offered "attractively packaged but unripe fruit".

During Sir Nicholas Shackleton's lifetime the worlds of the collector and professional period instrumentalist sometimes diverged in quite radical fashion. Clarinets were among the instruments that began to be widely copied within a musical environment where few period conductors showed much organological interest, ever anxious to be acceptable to modern ears. The regularisation of historical pitches, (for instance to A=415 or A=430) has been ironic, given that Quantz in 1752 lamented the lack of a uniform standard, which he reckoned was detrimental to his work as a flautist and to music in general. For today's players it is perhaps unfortunate that organological evidence in the public domain has tended to focus upon such matters as key mechanisms, bores and visual impact, with insufficient attempt to communicate the subtle quality of different instrumental sounds. Of course, words struggle to communicate certain aspects of art, whether quality of timbre or those tiny differences in emphases and timing that distinguish a great performance from a merely good one. As Daniel Türk put it in 1789, "certain subtleties of expression cannot really be described; they must be heard". The fascination with different nationalities of instrument which was a central focus of Nick's life as a collector has been largely ignored in the studio, with composers as diverse as Cherubini, Rossini and Beethoven routinely recorded on the same set of "period" instruments. Unripe fruit indeed!

The Reform Boehm system: Right Compromise Between French and German Systems ?

Luigi Magistrelli
Italy

In spite of the good tone qualities, hand forged mechanism, flexibility and evenness over all the registers, Reform Boehm system clarinets so far have not received a wide acceptance in the clarinet world. Is this system considered, perhaps, a sort of hybrid between the French and German Oehler system clarinets without its own identity ?  An opposite opinion is presented in this paper, that this instrument is an ideal compromise between the dark, compact and warm sound of the german Oehler system and the more flexible, brighter and technically easier to handle, French Boehm system. The paper aims to show the Reform Boehm and German system clarinets, comparing them and their distinctive (but also in a way similar) tonal characteristics, trying also to find some connections with the French system clarinets. Fritz Wurlitzer, father of Herbert Wurlitzer, was the first maker (before World War II) to make good Reform Boehm system clarinets, on the basis of the teaching of Schmidt and Kolbe. The author still considers them the best Reform Boehm clarinets ever made.

The Derivation of Contemporary Performing Techniques for Woodwind

Ian Mitchell
Trinity College of Music, London

Many of the extended techniques for woodwind that are found in modernist music from the 1950s onwards, and that became easily recognisable and archetypal contemporary music gestures for twenty years or so, are usually assumed to have been developed as a consequence of, and alongside, the demands of avant-garde music itself. These novel performing techniques created a whole new repertoire of sounds and ways of playing wind instruments. One of the earliest and most influential compositions was Berio's Sequenza 1 for solo flute, which, on the final page, requires the performer to produce more than one pitch simultaneously. However, some of these techniques that were thought to be current inventions, such as multiphonics, glissandi, flutter tongue, microtones, circular breathing, colour fingerings and more are actually far from new; indeed, in some instances they derive from practices thousands of years old.

This paper describes some of the techniques for clarinet in their avant-garde guise and uncovers their antecedents, which range from the ancient Greek aulos to twentieth century Albanian folk music.

Iwan Müller's Soprano Clarinet: Structural Evolution towards Adolphe Sax's Bass Clarinet

Juncal Diago Ortega Conseervatory of Music of A Coruña, Spain
José-Modesto Diago Ortega, Conservatory of Music of Cadix, Spain

Iwan Müller's developments demonstrate important elements and ideas influencing most of the clarinets manufactured subsequently in Europe (and in the world). Rarely is this heredity recognized in designs and patents. We can view Adolphe Sax's 1838 bass clarinet as the evolution and improvement, in the low register of the family, of the constructive system which was developed by the Russian inventor.

In Contemplation of the Clarinets at the Royal College of Music, London

Ingrid Elizabeth Pearson
Royal College of Music, London

Founded in 1882, the Royal College of Music enjoys a reputation as one of the world's leading conservatoires. Due partly to the vision of its founders, particularly Sir George Grove, the RCM holds research collections of international significance.

The Royal College of Music's Museum of Instruments, forming part of the Centre for Performance History, houses an internationally-renowned collection of over 800 instruments and accessories from c 1480 to the present (700 European, keyboard, stringed and wind; 100 Asian and African). This collection embraces some sixty instruments from the clarinet family, including specimens by Doleisch, Griesbacher and Scherer.

In using the RCM instruments as a case study, this paper examines the nature of such collections and the way in which objects interact within them.

The 'Stradivari Interview' - The Correlation between the Geometry of a Clarinet Mouthpiece and its Performance

William B. Peatman
Berlin

The playing characteristics of a clarinet such as tone, ease of blowing, tuning in the various ranges, brightness, carrying power are dependent upon many factors, not the least of which are the mouthpiece and the reeds used. Strangely the mouthpiece is the one main part of a clarinet which is no longer permanently associated with the instrument itself. Furthermore, as is well known, nominally identical mouthpieces perform with differing results!

Over the past 20 years the measuring instruments and methods presented here have been developed in an attempt to objectively evaluate a mouthpiece. With these instruments/methods the physical dimensions of a clarinet mouthpiece can be precisely determined: lay, rail widths, baffle, table, chamber, bore, window, angle of the lay and of the baffle with respect to the bore etc.

It is essential, however, that the parameters measured be compared objectively with the playing characteristics. This can be accomplished by comparing nominally identical mouthpieces and correlating their differences in performance with the differences in the physical parameters measured. The cooperation of experienced clarinettists is essential if the ultimate goal of these studies is to be achieved.

The Viennese Wind Instrument Maker, Theodor Lotz (c 1747-1792)

Melanie Piddocke
The Hague, Netherlands and Saintes, France

This paper commences with an examination of the current knowledge of Lotz's biographical details. Particular emphasis is placed on his career as a performer, maker and composer in an attempt to highlight possible influences which may have had an impact on his later career. As Freemasonry was a significant aspect of intellectual life in Vienna in the late eighteenth century, involving several significant musical figures - including Lotz - his involvement in the movement is therefore discussed in the context of the broader social significance of Freemasonry.

The main body of the paper concentrates on Lotz's activity as a maker, with particular reference to clarinets and basset horns. Lotz's instruments are placed in the context of contemporary wind instrument making through a brief discussion of the development of the clarinet and basset horn. The representation of Lotz's instruments by modern instrument makers is then discussed, using a comparative approach. Three modern copies of Lotz clarinets by different makers are contrasted with one another, and with the original instrument. The same methodology is then applied to two basset horns. Finally the legacy of Lotz is examined, with particular emphasis on the careers and instruments of his two pupils, Kaspar Tauber and Franz Scholl.

Clarinet Forked E-flat/B-flat; a New Approach

John Playfair
U.K.

L-hand forked E-flat/B-flat remains one of the few advantages of the simple system clarinet over the normal Boehm. Several successful solutions are reviewed, including a novel one involving fewer alterations than most.

The 'Melba Gift': the Role of Woodwind and Brass Instruments in the History of the Stabilisation of Pitch Standards in Melbourne in the early Twentieth Century

Simon Purtell
University of Melbourne, Australia

In December 1908, when a variety of pitches were used in Melbourne, the celebrated Australian soprano, Dame Nellie Melba, purchased a set of "normal pitch" (A4=435) woodwind and brass instruments from the London instrument manufacturer, Rudall, Carte & Co. In March of the following year, Melba presented these instruments to the Marshall-Hall Orchestra. This paper describes the instruments (including the four clarinets) and considers the important role played by the "Melba Gift" in the history of pitch standards in Melbourne in the early twentieth century. It draws upon ongoing research into the history of pitch standards in Melbourne and throughout the State of Victoria, an area of study not yet considered in histories of music in Australia.

A Prescription for the Clarinet's Sore Throat: Throat B-flat Mechanisms as Illustrated using Clarinets from the Sir Nicholas Shackleton Collection

Deborah Check Reeves
National Music Museum, University of South Dakota, Vermillion, USA

It has been described by Leon Leblanc as "inferior," producing "a tone less good than the others around it." It has been depicted by Rosario Mazzeo as "the problem note," and by William Stubbins as a "difficulty" and "has not been any secret from makers or players at any time in the history of the evolution of the clarinet." Most succinctly put by Geoffrey Rendall, "the real bug-bear is the middle b-flat."

The compromise in placement of the clarinet tone hole to produce an acceptable throat B-flat and yet facilitate easy production of the twelfths has been the subject of debate and experimentation since the invention of the clarinet. In his book The Clarinet, Rendall elaborates the problems encountered with the dual functioning speaker hole: "The basic cause of the trouble is the speaker. The air-column cannot be divided into the segments necessary to give the twelfths without a speaker, and strictly every separate note requires a different position of the speaker for perfect results ... one speaker in one fixed position has to do the duty of several ... the problem is aggravated by the necessity of using the speaker as a note-hole for middle b-flat as well. For this purpose the hole, to give an adequate note, must be of a certain diameter, and this diameter does not happen to be the ideal for overblowing ... [The maker is] forced to compromise in making the speaker-hole of a size to serve its dual purpose as adequately as possible." Lee Gibson, in his book Clarinet Acoustics, outlines the acoustical problems: "Frequency ratios between the first two harmonic modes of a closed pipe are more or less radically altered by the inverted hemispheric arc of errors induced in the opening of a speaker vent for the production of harmonic modes, particularly when this vent also functions as a primary producer of the tones of the third-line B-flat." Gibson concludes that "these faults prompted a century of searches for methods of separating the speaker function from that for the B-flat and for methods of reducing frequency ratios mistuned by the dually functioning speaker-B-flat vent ..."

This paper surveys the various methods that makers have prescribed for curing the clarinet's "sore" throat B-flat. The clarinet collection of Sir Nicholas Shackleton is a phenomenal source of examples that illustrate many of these methods. Instruments designed and/or made by Conn, Wurlitzer, Mazzeo, Romero, Kolbe, Leblanc, Boosey, Albert, and Heckel are examined.

Clarinets by Adolphe Sax

Thomas Reil
Uhingen, Germany

Most books on the clarinet have been paying tribute to Adolphe Sax's achievements for this instrument. His 1840 and 1842 patents relating to the soprano clarinet are often described in detail, nevertheless there has been no illustration of these or other Ad. Sax clarinets in any of the well-known publications yet, nor is there more information to be found in listings of public collections. Even the most important Catalogue des Instruments Sax au Musée Instrumental de Bruxelles by Malou Haine and Ignace de Keyser describes and shows only clarinets by Charles-Joseph Sax: the list included list of 400 Sax instruments gives only a report about a 13-keyed clarinet shown in 1890 at the London Royal Military Exhibition.

Sir Nicholas Shackleton's dicovery of a Sax clarinet corresponding to the 1842 patent can therefore not be rated highly enough. This clarinet being obviously a very rare and outstanding example of the Sax manufacturing, the question remains what a clarinet of Adolphe Sax's every-day production looked like.

Fortunately the author could acquire a nice and interesting 13-keyed clarinet marked "AD.SAX et Cie. / PARIS" which must date from Adolphe Sax's very early years at Paris, c 1842-1850. This find encouraged the author to do more research in this field. This paper presents both in words and pictures some thoughts on the remarkable fact that there are so few woodwind instruments extant of such a large production as came out of Adolphe Sax's factories.

The Bass Clarinets of Adolphe Sax and their Historical Importance

Albert Rice
Fiske Museum, Claremont Colleges, California

One of the most important advances in the evolution of the bass clarinet is manifest in an instrument made by the brilliant player, maker, and inventor Antoine Joseph (Adolphe) Sax (1814-1894). This paper presents a short review of 18th and early 19th century bass clarinet designs that precede Sax's 1838 bass clarinet, briefly reviews Sax's career, discusses the design innovations reflected in Sax's surviving bass clarinets, compares his bass clarinets to those by his contemporary Parisian rivals Louis August Buffet and Widemann, and shows the influence of his designs on instruments made by later makers.

In Brussels, Sax grew up learning instrument making from his father Charles Sax, a skilled and very successful woodwind and brass maker. By 1835, Charles was hailed as the foremost wind instrument maker in Europe, and in that same year his twenty one year old son exhibited in Brussels an improved clarinet with twenty four keys. From 1835 to 1842, Sax held the commanding position of "contremaîstre" in his father's factory which by that time employed about 250 workers.

Sax produced his first bass clarinet and received a Belgium patent for its design in 1838. Three surviving bass clarinets were made in Brussels and are presumed to have been made by Adolphe Sax or under his supervision. In late 1842, Sax established his instrument making factory in Paris. Only eight examples made in Paris are known today. Four of these are stamped and four others are attributed to Sax. They are made of boxwood, African black wood, or maple with brass ferrules and feature large plateau keys and open standing keys designed to cover large tone holes placed in their acoustically correct position. Sax's key mechanism actually consists of the usual thirteen or fourteen keys of the soprano clarinet, including a second Eb/Bb key to provide an option in fingering, and a second register key covering a small tone hole in a brass key seat placed high on the front side of the brass crook. The latter key was a genuine innovation and brilliant idea by Sax since with its use the response and equality of tones in the upper register were greatly improved. Most of the surviving bass clarinets are made with a straight body but three later instruments were made with an upturned bell and these were ultimately the most popular and successful models.

During the 1840s and 1850s, Sax's bass clarinets were used in orchestras and bands in Brussels and Paris. So the question arises, why are there so few extant Sax bass clarinets? Their scarcity is most likely due to their high price of 200 francs, documented in a price list of around 1845, higher than any other instrument offered by Sax except a bass saxophone, which is listed at 300 francs. In addition, the majority of Sax's instruments produced in Paris were brass instruments and saxophones. He appears not to have emphasized production of his woodwind instruments. Also, it must be noted that Sax was involved in at least three major court proceedings where he was sued by Parisian musical instrument makers whom he counter sued. This activity no doubt limited his time in producing and selling woodwinds.

In summary, Adolphe Sax produced superior playing bass clarinets which were copied by some makers but their greatest importance was in the use and modification of several of Sax's designs in the later bass clarinets by the important Parisian makers L.A. Buffet and Buffet-Crampon. By the 1870s, the modern bass clarinet had evolved and adopted worldwide.

The New Clarinet in Japan

E. Michael Richards
University of Maryland, Baltimore County, USA

A number of prominent, award-winning Japanese composers (Akira Nishimura, Hiroyuki Itoh, Hiroyuki Yamamoto) have recently completed new chamber music works for the author that demonstrate startling new possibilities for the clarinet. Their musical language draws from traditional Japanese aesthetics and music (such as gagaku), combined with the latest research in extended clarinet techniques for the Boehm system clarinet that the author has been working on for 25 years (this merging of Western and Japanese elements into a new music is just one example of a characteristic way of thinking within Japanese society that the Japanese call wa-kon-yo-sai - a Meiji era slogan that means Japanese spirit, or soul - foreign technology). This extended clarinet research, unlike previous studies which have generally consisted of mere catalogues of sound effects, is organized according to the peculiar acoustical principles of the clarinet. As a result, the music of the above composers can freely express micro-tonalities and timbral transformations such as microtonal sequences of multiphonics, fingered microtonal portamenti, vertical sonorities (multiphonics) where pitch components can be articulated in various ways, and numerous trills (multiphonic split trills and multiphonic timbre trills, split microtonal trills, and double trills affected [or not] by flutter tonguing and/or portamenti) that take on new coloristic qualities.

The Gaida Bagpipe in the Evros region of Greek Thrace

Haris Sarris
Greece

This paper presents the main points of the author's doctoral research at the University of Athens, which is an organological ethnography that focuses on the construction, the playing technique, and the repertoire of the gaida bagpipe in the Evros region of Greek Thrace. Part of the old agricultural world, the gaida died out in the course of the post-Second-World-War rapid urbanization. This urbanization process eventually resulted in the reduction of the number of musicians, the discontinuing of the instrument-making tradition, and the displacement of the gaida by the clarinet. At the time when this research started, in the late 1990s, the gaida was being reappreciated thanks to the activity of local folklore cultural clubs. Unfortunately, this did not lead to a passing on of the playing tradition to the younger generation.

In this context, the paper describes the instrument making process of the gaida using technological methodology and ethnographic data and the playing technique from a Westerner's point of view as well as from the natives' perspective. It explores the way natives perceive and categorize their repertoire. The structure of some sample pieces is analysed. Finally, a theory of 'musical-geographical streams' that surface in the repertoire of the gaida is proposed.

Brazilian Clarinet Music by the Composer Francisco Mignone and his 'Concertino for Clarinet and Orchestra'

Fernando Silveira
Rio de Janeiro State Federal University, Brazil

This paper studies, as a main objective, the freedom of interpretation taken by contemporary performers of the 'Concertino para clarineta e orquestra' (Concertino for clarinet and orchestra), by the Brazilian composer Francisco Mignone, through the historical context and thoughts of the composer, from the genesis of the musical work itself and from the contemporary philosophy of interpretation. To determine the above objective the recorded performances of four outstanding Brazilian clarinetists were analyzed.

Through data analysis interpretative reflections were offered that justified and/or complement the information collected from the performances, trying to find reasons for those decisions taken by the interpreters and proposing, for future performances, interpretative ways. As a secondary objective a critical edition of the score has been proposed.

Heinrich Grenser's Keywork Concepts

Eleanor Smith
University of Edinburgh

The Sir Nicholas Shackleton collection contains three clarinets by the German maker Heinrich Grenser (1764-1813), noted for his innovative clarinet keywork. This paper discusses the Grenser instruments in Shackleton's Collection: how they fit within his oeuvre, and how they reflect on Grenser's statement in the Allgemeine musikalische Zeitung of 1811 highlighting the importance of the basic five-key instrument.

Resources for Clarinet Research in the Boosey & Hawkes Collection and Archive

E. Bradley Strauchen-Scherer
Horniman Musuem, London

In 2004, the Horniman Museum became the new home of the instrument collection formerly housed in the museum at the Boosey & Hawkes factory in Edgware and also of the firm's instrument production and design archives. These collections represent an important resource to researchers of British clarinet design and performance practice. Clarinet making was the leading activity of woodwind production at Boosey. This is reflected by the unusual and innovative clarinets collected for the factory's museum, which was curated by Eric McGavin, an active clarinettist, from 1950 to 1970. Instruments in the collection include prototype clarinets designed for Boosey by George Clinton and Manuel Gomez. Some 330 technical drawings dating from the late 19th century to the 1970s detail aspects of clarinet design from tone hole placement and bore profile to mouthpiece and key design. Extensive manufacturing records allow clarinet production at Boosey to be traced from the late 19th century into the 1970s. This paper provides an introduction to resources available to researchers of clarinet design and history in the Boosey & Hawkes Collection and Archive at the Horniman Museum, London.

Nicholas Shackleton: Collector extraordinaire

William Waterhouse
London and Cheltenham

What differentiates the Musical Instrument collector from collectors of other kinds of art-object? Noteworthy collectors of the past and present are identified, and their differing achievements and motivations are discussed. Sir Nicholas Shackleton's status in this company is examined, together with his outstanding contribution to organology as researcher and author.

Boosey and Company: Trade in Clarinets in the Late Nineteenth Century

Kelly White
Albuquerque, New Mexico

Extant Boosey & Company Stock Books, covering the periods 1868-1873, 1874-1875, 1882-1885, and 1896-1899, account for the sales of woodwind, brass wind and percussion instruments. These records provide information about the sale of individual instruments and to whom the instruments were sold, which helps to paint a more complete picture of Boosey & Co not only as an instrument manufacturer, but as a supplier and retailer of instruments.

This paper discusses the sale of clarinets by Boosey & Co based on the accounts kept in the Stock Books. Elements of this paper include defining what makes and models of clarinets were sold; a discussion of to whom clarinets were sold and possible connections between the clients needs and the model of clarinet purchased; and creating a general image of Boosey & Co's niche in the later part of the 19th Century.

Return to EUCHMI Welcome Page

This page updated: 12.12.12